Home World Business Goldman’s trading miss stuns Wall Street

Goldman’s trading miss stuns Wall Street


Goldman Sachs fell short of earnings expectations due to a drop in quarterly trading revenue, prompting analysts to demand explanations for underperformance in an area where the bank usually outshines rivals.

Newly appointed finance chief R. Martin Chavez said Goldman’s clients traded less with the bank because markets were calmer and because it does not lend as much as competitors. Banks with bigger balance sheets, like JPMorgan Chase & Co, tend to profit not only from financing corporations but from capturing hedging and other markets-related business as well.

Goldman's 2 per cent decline in trading revenue came in sharp contrast to results from JPMorgan Chase & Co, Citigroup ... Goldman’s 2 per cent decline in trading revenue came in sharp contrast to results from JPMorgan Chase & Co, Citigroup and Bank of America. Photo: Victor J. Blue

“We underperformed this quarter,” he said on a conference call with analysts.

Analysts seemed unsatisfied with explanations from Chavez and outgoing CFO Harvey Schwartz. They were unusually tough during a Q&A session, with all but one of six pressing management about trading results, especially in fixed income.

Goldman’s 2 per cent decline in trading revenue came in sharp contrast to results from JPMorgan Chase & Co, Citigroup and Bank of America, which all beat estimates due to strength in trading.

Credit Suisse analyst Christian Bolu said Goldman investors were showing some “nervousness” about the strength of the business, and UBS’s Brennan Hawken chastised the performance, saying that topping the prior year should have been “kind of easy”.

“I’m not fully – I’m still confused,” said Hawken, adding, “I have some company.”

Goldman’s shares tumbled 5.3 per cent to $US214.47 in afternoon trade in New York.

During the first quarter the CBOE Volatility Index reached its lowest level since before financial crisis. Oil prices were also trading at years-low volatility levels.

That lack of volatility meant its investor clients, many of them hedge funds, were trading less. Goldman’s unusually large exposure to commodities trading also hurt its fixed income business.

In the best of times, Goldman generated more than $US6 billion in quarterly revenue from fixed-income trading. In more recent years, the business has come under pressure from factors including weak market activity and new regulations that restrict what US banks can do and how much capital they must hold against trades.

Goldman’s profit rose from a difficult year-ago quarter, with earnings per share of $US5.15 versus $US2.68. But the results were well short of analyst forecasts of $US5.31 per share, on average, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S.

Goldman has historically relied more on trading than other big banks, but has been trying to shift to relatively stable businesses like investment management and lending.

Revenue from investment banking, investment management and investing and lending all rose in the first quarter, but not enough to offset the sharp decline in trading.

Overall, Goldman’s profit rose 80 per cent to $US2.2 billion from $US1.2 billion in the first quarter of 2016, when sliding commodity prices, worries about the Chinese economy and uncertainty about US interest rates led to weak results across Wall Street. Its revenue rose 27 per cent to $US8 billion from $US6.3 billion.

The bank’s expenses rose just 15 per cent and it paid out a smaller share of its revenue to employees. Its closely watched compensation-to-revenue ratio was 41 per cent in the first quarter, down from 42 per cent a year earlier, but higher than the 38 per cent ratio it reported for all of 2016.

Goldman’s chief rival Morgan Stanley will report on Wednesday.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here